All credit for this document goes to https://www.truthcontrol.com/atonists
On reading the document I felt I needed to make sure that a copy was preserved.
In our opinion, the Merovingian and Carolingian dynasties were connected to the Atonists of Egypt and to the Israelites of biblical history. Interestingly, the Merovingians descended from the female line of the Sicambrian Franks (a Germanic tribe, first century BC) whose kings referred to themselves as "People of the Covenant." The Emperor Charlemagne was of Frankish blood. The Sicambri are believed to have been related to the ancient Scythians whose kings and princes had close connections to Egypt of the 18th dynasty, and to the Milesian (Atonist) conquerors of Ireland.
Although many of the world's orders and fraternities were created and funded by the Cult of Aton, some were not. And because one has to advance quite high in the masonic hierarchy before becoming privy to the real agenda, a few well-meaning masons, due to their natural humanism, have attempted to expose the darker corners of their own organization. Winston Churchill was one such whistle-blower. For a short period during his political career he appeared dedicated to exposing corruption in high places. When a whistle-blower, such as Churchill, operates from within the system, the "higher-ups" have two main ways of dealing with them. The first method commonly used is assassination, of either the professional or physical kind. The second method involves initiating the whistle-blower to a higher position in the hierarchy. This provides them with a deeper insight into the master plan than they previously possessed. This promotion is usually attended by material reward. This method has proved very successful down through the years and has served to silence potentially rogue voices. Some esteemed masons spoke openly against what they imagined to be the subversion of their humanitarian order. Perhaps, they took masonry for what it was meant to be, for what it was said to be, or for what they imagined it to be, as they reverently advanced through its many ranks. Masons are, after all, not the only ones to be duped by the company they keep or by the societies they serve. In any case, the warning calls of the suspicious and aware, in masonry, went largely unheeded.
This perfidious cabal [Cult of Aton] also funds and controls the world's major charities, the majority of the US Protestant (pro-Zionist) evangelist pastors, the newspapers and media networks for the youth, the music and pharmaceutical monopolies, the Federal Reserve and its banks, the United Nations, the Vatican, and the Jesuits, and the major think-tanks and space programs (NASA - "...the Eagle has landed"). The symbols on the currency (notes and coins) that government (British and American) buys from the private banks in order to sustain its existence, furnish the student with proof-positive as to the truth of this last statement. Moreover, the terms "Camp David" and "Capitol Hill" are oblique references to the City of Jerusalem and traditions of the Levites. The term "breaking the law" is a reference to Moses (Akhenaton) literally breaking the "Law of the Covenant." The red carpet that potentates and politicians habitually walk upon represents the bloodline of the ancient Luciferian dynasty whose origins are lost in the opaque mists of time.
Controlled and funded by the Cult of Aton, the Judites were content to eventually accept Aton (or Adonai) as their god. The thirteen levels of the pyramid and the thirteen stars above the eagle's head, together with every other emblem therein, represent the ancient cults. They particularly denote the Solar Cult of Aton that conceals itself behind Judaism, Christianity, and the secret societies such as the Knights of Columbus, Knights Templar, Freemasons, Jesuits, and Illuminati, etc. If we look closely, we will see 33 feathers in the wing of Aton’s eagle. This number represents the masonic order that has 33 main degrees of initiation in its hierarchical pyramidical structure. This occult family of Aton sits at the top of the power pyramid and has operated by way of its many lieutenants, the Levites, Pharisees, Greeks, Romans, Venetians, Hanovers of Holland, French and Italian Popes, British Royals (Plantagenet, Tudor, Stuart, and Windsor dynasties),and exploitatory conglomerates such as the East-Indian Company and Russell Trust (Virginia and Hudson Bay Companies), that were behind the "discovery" of America's original thirteen states (New Israel), and that own and control both political parties within America today.
This family [House of Rothschild] began their rise to prominence in the eighteenth century, in Frankfurt-on-Main. Their family's insignia - an eagle with arrows - appears on the American one dollar bill. The symbol can be traced back to the so-called Tribe of Manasseh or, more correctly, to the Atonist Solar Cults of Egypt. A great deal of modern history can be understood when we realize that powerful noble families such as Rothschild, Sassoon, Bauer, Oppenheimer, Warburg, Mocatta, Lazard, Montagu, Goldman Sachs, and Schiff, etc, with seats in the House of Lords, with daughters and sons married into royalty, and with the lion's share of worldly wealth, are merely lieutenants for imperialists who prefer to remain in the shadows of history. The ancient Caesars of Rome were never seen in public. The modern Caesars, who truly control the world, also avoid the limelight. Their ship of state is steered by lesser hands. Even their officially endorsed biographies (such as that by Fredrick Norton) speak of their scandalous antics and business machinations.
After the massacres and devastation by Roman forces in Jerusalem, the Levites moved to the cities of Jamnia, Pumbedita, and Usha, in Babylon, and formed their talmudic academies that lasted for centuries.It was in these cities that the talmudists collated the esoteric knowledge acquired from Egypt. It is from these cities that they conceived their plans for world domination. After their establishment in Babylon, the dispersed lower-class Israelites and Judites of the world knew to look to the talmudic academies for guidance and education in Jewish history. Interestingly, the head potentates of these ancient academies were known as the Gaonim. These Gaonim were considered princes of sacred knowledge and, as such, they commanded the greatest reverence imaginable. It is, therefore, our opinion that these Levitical Gaonim, resident in Palestine and Babylon, were the descendants of the even more ancient Cult of Aton. Furthermore, it is our contention that the masonic letter or cipher "G" stands for these self-proclaimed Exilarchs, the "Princes of Light" - the Gaonim. In short, we do not think that it is far-fetched to suppose that the Compass and Square might refer to the builder's guilds and to the construction of the Temple of Sol-Aton, as well as to the socio-political New World Order. As Ralph Ellis has shown, the pyramids of Giza were considered personal property by the Hyksos during their domination of the Delta area.
Behind the masonic lodges hides the same "Brotherhood of the Snake," or Cult of Aton, that created Christianity (and its many denominations), that established the Vatican, and set its many popes, bishops, and priests in place. This same organization established the Illuminati, Rosicrucians, and Knights Templar that, in turn, control the world's myriad secret societies, fraternities, and charities. Let us not doubt why it is that Per me reges regnant ("through me kings reign") is a chief masonic motto. Let us not doubt what historical person masons have enthroned at the top of their Egyptian pyramid.
The various masonic lodges are dependent upon the patronage of the descendants of the Atonists, the great royal dynasties of Europe (Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Merovingian, Guise, Stuart, Savoy, Battenberg, Bowes-Lyon, and so on). Senior members of these Houses were, and still are, either the biological or the ideological descendants of Akhenaton's Cult of Aton and of the "Brotherhood of the Snake." Their symbolism betrays this if nothing else does. In the case of the name Merovingian, we might again note that the syllable mer meant "pyramid," and also "high ones." In regards to the name Capetian, we see the word is similar to cap, and also to captain which, again, connotes a chief or leader. The Capetians were known as the "big heads."
The Cult of Aton is behind the so-called "New Age Movement" that rose to power in the 1960s and '70s. It is the force behind Fabianism, Zionism, and Spiritualism, and its agents also operate and fund many secret societies, fraternal orders, charities, and think-tanks throughout the world. Its agents operate in every corner of the world and infest political and secular communities. Its lieutenants can be identified as the Jesuit Order, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, Knights Templar, Knights of Malta, and the myriad other secret and semi-secret organizations that exist.
So, given that our timing is appropriate, it can now be stated openly that the engine of deception known as the "Vatican" is under the auspices of the Cult of Aton. This most perverse of cults is also responsible for the rise of Protestantism that is, in truth, merely a branch of the tree of Vatican Catholicism. Both religions have roots in Egypt of the eighteenth dynasty and the time of Akhenaton.
The Roman Catholic Church is the main offshoot and continuation of the ancient Egyptian Solar Cult of Aton. Its popes are not styled upon Jesus (which is patently obvious) but on Akhenaton -Egypt's great potentate and grand minister for the god of light.
To discover the present whereabouts of the Cult of Aton we need look no further than the Vatican in Rome. It is from popes ("white" and "black") and from their hired lieutenants that the insidious lies of history come, the most ludicrous of which insisted creation's history to be a mere 5,000 years old. If we find concocted history, faked biography, spurious gospel accounts, rivaling factions (all professing uniqueness), massacred civilizations, looted lands, immolated martyrs, condemned free-thinkers, tortured rebels, and indoctrinated masses unaware of the sick theological lies they and their forefathers have been ingesting, we should know from what vile source it all emanates. We must endeavor to expose this corruption while inquiring into its strange origins. We must also waste no time arming ourselves with knowledge to fend off the insidious effects of this inhuman leviathan that grows ever more powerful from our ignorance and compliance.
The term Juda means the "shining" or "illustrious ones." It refers to the members of the Gaonim, or the Cult of Aton, and not to some black-robe-wearing priestarchy. It refers to the eighteenth dynasty Sun Cult pharaohs of Egypt whose descendants hide under the names "Israelite" and"Judite." So when we hear that “David” and “Solomon” (whom we now know as Tuthmosis III and Amenhotep III) were of the "House of Judah" we understand that it was a reference not to the Semites, or the Levites and their ethnicity and theology, but to Egypt's Solar Cult and their theology.
The following appellations are Druidic in origin, but have long been appropriated and falsely assigned:
Jew (Judah, Judite, Yahud)
Adonai (Yahweh, Jehovah)
When and if we read these terms, and others of their kind, or hear them mentioned, we must think Egypt, Hyksos, and Cult of Aton.
Firstly, we have doubts about the two captivity stories, and doubts about the formation of any colony at the place known as Israel. Our main reason for this doubt concerns the destiny of the earlier exiles, those Hyksos who were expelled en masse by Ahmose I. Where did these people go? Surely, these fabulously wealthy and powerful ex-pharaohs of Egypt were not doomed to be wanderers in the wilderness for forty years. After their departure would not these Hyksos have swiftly and intelligently ingratiated themselves with their allies in Nubia, Minoan Crete, Sardinia (Shardana), Greece, Italy, Persia, Babylon, and possibly even among the Phoenicians? We think it most likely that the Hyksos of old, of the first Egyptian exodus, did find new homes in the lands around Egypt and possibly within its borders, in cities of the Eastern Delta such as Tanis. Therefore, would they not have welcomed and protected the Judites, their blood-kin, who had been themselves ousted from hated Egypt? We think this was definitely the case. We do not think the Judites experienced a single day of hardship after their unceremonious departure. If the Atonists were in these places it was as favored guests. It was their own mythographers who altered the accounts to make them read the way they do. We also believe there were strong ties between the Atonists of Egypt and the Scythians, and that together these contingents decided to make a move back to the West in order to secure new seats of power in Greece, Italy, Spain, France, and Britain. We understand, however, that they did not wish to have their royal Egyptian connections emphasized. We understand that their choice of names was based on this need for concealment. For them Egypt was taboo and references to their role in its history would be drastically distorted and underplayed. The terms adopted as monikers, such as "Levite," "Israelite," "Hebrew," and "Judite," etc, were terms that primarily connoted their theological status and duties. These were common terms for priests, particularly of the Stellar, Saturnian, and Solar Cults. They did not signify ethnicity. In fact, as we strongly advocate, these terms originally derived from Ireland and from the Druids. The fact that Egyptian and Druidic iconography permeated Judeo-Christianity was just an anomaly that would have to be covered up and downplayed through time. This was agreed by all. This ploy has been deliberate and has, for the most part, succeeded. The iconography exists and has always puzzled scholars and researchers who cannot account for it unless they accept the official story of the captivity of the Jews in Egypt, a fiction from start to finish. For instance, the term "King" (as in"King Solomon," etc) could not have come to be used by the "Israelites" unless there was a strong Egyptian influence. A king could not declare himself a representative of god unless he was familiar with the sacred "Land of Khem" and with the theology of the Amenite priesthood that had declared their kings to be living agents of god. It was not the Jews who originated such concepts. And these are only two of many hundreds of examples.
As we have emphasized elsewhere, one of the Atonist's most cunning strategies involves the concealment of their existence. They have literally created fictive peoples and races to pose in their place with no provable historical connection to Egypt. When limelight falls across those with no legitimate connection to the ancient thrones of the world it is not upon those frequenters of the shadows who do have that connection. The Jews who exist today, and who are Jewish by simple religious conversion, have no authentic racial or ethnic ties to the so-called "holy land" at all. Nevertheless, they remain obsessed with the idea, implanted by duplicitous rabbis under allegiance to the Vatican and the Atonists, that their ancestors are the ones who walked with Noah, Enoch, Abraham, Lot, and Solomon, and who witnessed the building of the great "Temple"in the good old days of the kings. The world teems with duplicitous scholars, "historians," and Zionist (Atonist) spin doctors secretly commissioned to perpetuate this fabulous disinformation.
Renegade Pharaoh Akhenaton - the "Son of the Sun" (Aton). The real "King of the Jews." He was the master of the Levites and of the "12 Tribes" under his dominion. His "biography" is the Bible, his instrument of torture - Judeo-Christianity! His Cult of Aton was, and is, identical to the pre-diluvian "Brotherhood of the Snake." His minions are the Vatican, the Illuminati, Templars, Royals and British-Israelites - enemies of freedom and truth, each and all The Atonists have expertly employed their age old symbols to indicate their presence to the symbolically literate. From their bases of operation (Tanis, Alexandria, Rome, London, New York,and Washington DC) and through their lieutenants they control the world, their new Egypt.
The Masonic apron, compass, and letter "G" for the Gaonim. The symbolism of Masonry, which scholars believe to be Judaic, is primarily Atonist. We believe that the high level Atonists withing Judaism, were the Gaonim. They were descended from those Levitical elders who recieved the so-called "Oral Tradition" at Mount Sinai. Later Talmudists and Zionists are frontmen for the Gaonim. The lower case "G" is serpentine, symbolizing the Dragon Court that stretches back to the pre-diluvian epoch. The priests of the sun at Heliopolis, as well as at other places, employed the symbol of the serpent, as did the pharaohs. In Gaelic, the name of the sun is Grian, and the Masonic G is frequently depicted with rays of light emanating from it.
The Levites began the compilation of their suggestively named "Law of Moses" in the period following the alleged Assyrian captivity, but before the Babylonian arrest, during the 7th century BC. Moses, of course, had long since passed from the scene and knew nothing of this Levitical Law composed in his name. From this point onward, what lord god Jehovah said was whatever the Levites said he said. No one could argue the point since, before the "Law" and the Levites Book of Deuteronomy existed, nothing was written down. Nevertheless, the Levites declared themselves to be exceptional because Moses had handed down to them an oral tradition that remained undisclosed to the uninitiated. This fact alerts us since it is the perfect ruse by which the Atonists could disguise their identity from both Jews and Christians. The oral law was a secret law and so no outsider could have a clue what it said. This oral law dates from the time of Moses' ascent of Mount Sinai. The Book of Deuteronomy ("Second Law") concerns the oral tradition's precepts, and clearly shows an objective reader that the Levites were interested in only one thing, that is condemning and murdering everyone who stood against them. Religious intolerance could not have a better manifesto. And the weapon suggested to be used against the world by this Machiavellian dossier - was fear:
Naturally, the sane among the Atonists wanted nothing to do with such monstrous scheming. They soon decided to go their own way. Biblical tradition tells us that the "chosen people" lived together in Israel for about 500 years. After 250 years they chose to divide themselves into two "Houses." Eventually, we are told that Israel was attacked and large portions of both Houses were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. The House of Judah (Aton) was particularly vulnerable since they were, unlike the Israelites, few in number. Allegedly, after their release by the Assyrians, the Judites and Israelites again suffered invasion and captivity at the hands of the Babylonians. After this period of bondage, the ten tribes of "Israel" decided not to return to their homes and Temple in Palestine but to emigrate Westward across the Caucasus Mountains and into the lands beyond. Only two tribes were still fanatical enough to allegedly make a return to Jerusalem, the "Tribe of Benjamin" and "Tribe of Levi." It is from these tribes that Levitical Judaism arose. From this tradition came the Gaonim, the Sadducees, Zadokites, Khazars, and Kabalistic colleges that were instrumental in creating the smokescreens behind which the Cult of Aton would operate.
From this point onward the two houses - of Jews (Judah) and Israelites (Israel) - parted company. We can surmise that it was at this point that the main body of the Israelites (so called) did not agree with the Atonist plan for world domination [New World Order].
It is this Tribe of Judah that was, in our estimation, Atonist.
Clearly, Yahweh was based on Aton and not so much upon older gods. The edicts which the Atonists brought out of Egypt, those scripted and levied by Akhenaton and his direct descendants, were simply camouflaged as the "oral tradition” of the Levitical elite. The ordinary "Jew" would not be privy to this tradition. To this very day the majority of biblical researchers and practitioners of the Judeo-Christian religion are unaware that the oral tradition (that eventually became the basis of Talmudic Judaism) was Egyptian and Atonist in origin. The Levites cunningly rescripted their history and liberally plagiarized the cultural archives of many other Occidental and Oriental religions and ethnic groups, including the Irish, the Goths, and the Phoenicians. As we demonstrate on these following pages there is not a shred of factual evidence for their "history." The authors of the Abraham story afforded no dates for this legendary migration, and that omission alone speaks volumes. It is from their time with Akhenaton and his cult of the sun that the Levites began to believe they had a special spiritual destiny. Doubtless, this absurd racist notion was due to their indoctrination by, and identification with, a crazed, perverse, and egomaniacal renegade pharaoh who believed himself to be divinely inspired and glorious; we might say - a legend in his own mind.
The biblical editors (believed to have been working and compiling in Babylon between the sixth and third centuries BC) decided to include this fabulous tale of Abraham and his devious and inexcusable intrigue against the pharaoh, to subtly cast doubt upon the parentage of a most important person in Jewish history, namely their son Isaac. If Sarai lay with pharaoh on the first night of their wedding ceremony (as was the custom), then could not Isaac of the Jews, of the seed of Abraham, not be of the house of pharaoh instead? It is our belief that this tie probably did exist and that it was covered up by the biblical editors who were under orders from the Cult of Aton as to what to write. It would have seriously weakened the allegiances and ties between the Jews and the Cult of Aton if it was to be realized that there were close bonds to earlier pharaohs. As a result, the connection was downplayed so that the Atonists (those with an intense hated toward Egypt) could maintain the respect and allegiance of their Jewish servants. They wanted the Jews who followed and served them to develop the same antipathy that they possessed towards their original homeland and the pharaohs of previous dynasties. The Egyptian iconography and cosmology would remain in order to embellish the books, writings, and religion, but the blood ties would be obscured and only obliquely referenced. We also suppose that it was due to this intimate blood tie that the migration of Abraham from outside Egypt was concocted. If it could be shown that the first generation patriarch was not himself of Egypt but from some other place, and if he was sent from the outside into Egypt, the story would be more palatable to the Atonist editors of the bible, those "paying the bills," so to speak. The role of Sarai had to be played down as much as possible. The readers of later generations were not to know that she was an honored woman and wife to a pharaoh. So, the story of the Lord appearing to Abraham and giving him the covenant (Genesis 15:18) was concocted to make him the more appealing and striking character. Now all eyes would be focused upon Abraham and his Lord and on some vague inexplicable "covenant." Attention would not be on Sarai or Isaac's true father, the suggestively unnamed and mightily deceived pharaoh, who was the true father of the so-called "Twelve Tribes of Israel." In the Book of Genesis we are told that Sarai was unable to bear children, which is why she offered up her maid-servant, Hagar, to her husband Abraham. Clearly, this was another fabricated addition to steer readers away from the truth. (See Genesis 16:11.)
This punitive, intolerant, self-important, and renegade dynasty, lionized by modern historians were, as investigator William Bramley rightly advocates, senior priests of the pre-diluvian Dragon Court, or "Brotherhood of the Snake." These lords, and their senior ministers and priests, symbolized their long genealogies by a tree and a serpent. We still use the image of a tree today when charting family histories. The serpent was appropriate because it represented not only the movement of time but the secret tradition preserved by these families through the ages. This sacred tradition came down from the pre-diluvian epochs and those who were initiated into it employed the symbol of the serpent. The image of the serpent or dragon signified kingship, civic authority, and spiritual mastery. During the corrupt rule of the Broken Kings the people of Egypt were expressly forbidden from venerating any other deity except the sun god Aton (or Aten). The Atonists forcibly closed the great temples, instigated their monotheistic cult, and allowed foreign elements in to the country.They had centers at Gizeh, Amarna, Avaris, and Tanis, and specifically at Heliopolis, where the powerful Solar Cult had been established for millennia. The priesthood of Heliopolis had been powerful even during the theocratic dominion of the god Amen Ra (Amun) who was primarily worshipped at Thebes, the center of the Egyptian universe. They rose to greater power under the Pharaoh Tuthmosis IV (1419 and 1386 BC). He was not of royal blood and it is suggestive that he was apparently not favored by his own energetic chariot-riding father Pharaoh Amenhotep II. The consensus of modern scholars is that Tuthmosis IV was selected for the throne by the priests of the sun cult at Heliopolis. He was but one of his father's many sons and very little is known of his life or rule.
For these reasons we do not agree with the writers and investigators who believe the Gospels to have been written at the behest of Rome for political reasons. The intellectual elite within the Sadducees and Romans were not in the least bit perturbed by the zealots of Judea. They considered the Messianic idea of ordinary Jews totally redundant. If pacifying Jews was their desire they could have groomed a real, living savant and let him loose, professing himself to be the Messiah. They could have promoted a man to impersonate the Messiah and no one would have been the wiser. This would have made better sense than to simply create the history of one in writing and hope that people would read it and react. No! The idea was to create a new religion based on the old Atonist model to appeal to a Western audience. Whether this religion and its Christ was accepted by the Jews or not was barely a concern. They could accept Christ or they could deny him. What did it matter to Rome and the Caesars? This is why Josephus barely mentions the Messiah in his vast works and why Christianity was established in Rome and not Judea. Christianity was the brain-child of one small elite group of Atonists resident in Rome, and of their intellectual colleagues, the Sadducees. Its central hero was a hybrid of several pagan deities and heroes, and partly based on the old Jewish Messiah. But the creators of the new religion, and of Christ, knew that the real Messiah was an Egyptian concept and not a Jewish one. The real Messiah was a descendant of the House of David, and that meant them. The claims made by the Jews meant nothing and would never come to pass - as they have not.
The Atonists had left Egypt in the company of their Israelite brethren. After their exile, and after falling out amongst themselves, the Atonists found themselves vulnerable and few in number. These Atonist-Levites carried with them the gnosis imparted to them by Akhenaton and his descendants. They were a privileged priesthood and had little time for the mass of Israelites that had accompanied them and eventually fallen back to old pagan beliefs. A close reading of the factional conflict at Mount Sinai reveals as much. We read that Moses (Akhenaton) became furious after discovering his disgruntled followers were backsliding into the worship of the golden calf (symbol for the god Amen-Ra and the previous Age of Taurus). As the centuries passed the elite Atonist Levites had less and less to do with their erstwhile lower class brethren, the Israelites. Ten tribes had assimilated into the Western lands and only the so-called Tribes of Benjamin and Levi (The Levites) had stayed true to the oral tradition handed down to them at Sinai. These hardliners knew themselves to be heirs of the pharaohs and they did not relish their fate, nor plan to continue scrounging around the wastelands in exile. They had their minds set on ingratiation with their many allies in Assyria, Babylonia, Crete, Greece, and Italy. It is our belief that they were more than successful in their intent and that they did indeed enjoy the confidence of foreign powers. When the Grecian Empire gave way to that of the Roman, the Atonist families continued to prosper and liaise. They concerned themselves solely with making inroads into civilized nations and winning power-allies and not with the goings on in Judea of people they considered arch-betrayers. If their old pals were being conquered and harassed, that was just hard luck on them. They were merely receiving their just desserts for past iniquity. They did not want Aton so they could have the Roman Jupiter instead. They could wait for their promised Messiah for as long as they wished. He was not coming, because he was already there.The Atonists who insinuated themselves into the upper class of Roman society considered themselves direct descendants of Akhenaton. They were the "Messiah" that Jews were foolishly expecting. Paul and his Christ character of the New Testament were merely loudspeakers, messengers, proclaimers crying in the wilderness "make straight the way of the Lord Aton."
Before they arrived in Rome, the Herodian dynasty were allegedly known as Edomites, and we strongly suspect they were connected to the descendants of the Atonists and to the Hyksos "Shepherd Kings," of Egypt. The word Edom is believed to have meant "red men," or "men from the red land," and the color red is associated with the Hyksos bloodline. The Herod family was both Jewish and Roman, and we believe them to have been puppets of the Atonists ensconced in France and Britain.
The Herodians, known as "Kings of the Jews" were a Jewish-Roman elite of great power and prestige. They were Edomites (Idumeans) or Hyksos, that is - Atonists. A few experts believe that the letter "I," at the beginning of Idumean, should be a "J." They believe the word is a rough and deliberate corruption of Judean. This makes sense. This is merely one example of how words and terms have been tampered with so that the truth about mankind's past remains distorted.
The expelled Atonists of Egypt had quickly managed to find new homes in Greece, Syria, Crete, and other countries, so it is not unlikely that they also had many friends in Italy, especially among the patrician families who admired Egypt and who would one day conquer it for themselves. Yes, the Atonists would have coveted the hospitality of the Roman elite. In Rome they would have had access to the men whose empires controlled the world. From there they could commission agents to concoct historical and religious motifs to suit their vision of themselves. We believe Rome was chosen as a new headquarters by Akhenaton's Atonists.
With a similar mindset as Dr. Karl Abraham and Dr. Sigmund Freud, the authors Ahmed Osman and Moustafa Gadalla both insist that the biblical Moses was the Pharaoh Akhenaton and that the expulsion of Moses from Egypt during the later eighteenth dynasty was, in fact, the expulsion of the "broken king" Akhenaton. The scene at Sinai, the subsequent move to Jerusalem, and the eventual splitting of the twelve tribes, were events that occurred not to humble oppressed captives but to an arrogant and wealthy royal clan, followers of a pharaoh considered the father of monotheism. Soon after arrival at Sinai legend has it that Moses died. His place as leader of the Levites (Atonists) was taken by a mysterious man called Joshua. Osman believes this character to have been the true Jesus. If Osman is correct it means that Jesus lived over 1000 years before the official dates given by Paul and by the four spurious gospels. It also means that Jesus was an Egyptian.
As we have outlined in Volume One, Christianity was created in Britain and eventually transplanted to the Middle East. The story of Jesus did not originate in Galilee or Judea as the Gospels state. The men who invented the story of Jesus had their origins in Egypt of the eighteenth dynasty. They were the Atonists.
After the eighteenth dynasty, princes and priests of Aton became the most powerful monarchs and theocrats in the world. The Atonists operated from behind serveral fronts. One of these was the Sol Invictus Cult to which Emperor Constantine belonged. He was an initiate of this order during the time he established Christianity. Therefore, as far as we are concerned, Constantine and his royal descendents were Atonists. They were guided and financed by the biological or ideological descendents of Akhenaton, who established the worship of Aton.
The bible is a compilation of numerous occidental and oriental pagan doctrines. Its compilation was commissioned by the chiefs of the Solar Cult (Atonists) situated in Tanis, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Rome, in order to galvanize their empire and maintain control over the minds of the mass of illiterate and superstition-ridden human beings under their dominion. Dominion over men and the world was what it was all about, and little has changed when it comes to this agenda.
The elements that we now associate with Judaism and Christianity were brought to the West (to Greece, Rome and Britain) by Atonists exiled from Egypt.
The Atonists had lost their thrones in Egypt, but the event did not signal the end of their history. In fact, it was just the beginning. They traveled West to Spain and Ireland not as wanderers without a hope or plan but because they knew of Ireland, and of its significance.
The Atonists believed they would be welcomed in the land of their ancestors. However, they were wrong. We suppose the Druids chose to remain loyal to the Amenist pharaohs of Egypt and that, after hearing of Akhenaton's heresy and belligerence against the old gods and Egyptian people, they warily denied the Atonists entry into their land. As a result of this rejection, the Atonists regarded the Druids in a similar light as the Amenists. They reacted with open war.
Let us always bear in mind, however, that this campaign of eradication [of the Druids] did not begin with Romans or Christians. It began with these displaced invading Atonists who sought to erect a new global empire upon which the sun would never set.